Abstract/Associational Forms

So far in class we have watched a number of films, many of them capable of being formally described as abstract or associational. These two forms have a number of similarities and differences. First of all neither are rhetorical in form. There is no narration involved in these types of films. There also lacks a particular order in which the images are sequenced. Both types of films (abstract and associational) contain basic objects with color, shape and size.
When someone views an abstract form film, they will not look for linked events that make a narrative or an argument. An abstract film is usually organized around visual features, in a way that is referred to as "theme and variations." "Ballet Mecanique" (a film watched in class) is an example of an abstract film that uses theme and variation, as well as rhythm. It is set up with a basic look and feel at the beginning, it keeps the same "theme" throughout the film, but there is no argument or narrative involved.
Associational films obviously share some qualities with abstract film, but at the same time they share their own unique qualities. The associational form invites interpretation. They have a general meaning behind them but the viewer can interpret it their own way. Koyaanisqatsi is an example of that. We all know its basic point is to serve as environmental commentary. It shows how the environment and society has evolved since industrialization. But, it lacks narrative therefore leaving it relatively open to specific meanings.
Ballet Mecanique being the abstract example, and Koyaanisqatsi being the associational example, are good "examples" of each type of form. A viewer will interact with these films differently (for many reasons), but they carry some similar qualities. Both lack narrative, both carry some type of rhythm. Althought Koyaanisqatsi's rhythm is often broken up and completely changed. These are good examples of their "genre" and how the two "genres" (abstract and associational) are similar and different.